Children’s Health Defense files RICO lawsuit against the American Academy of Pediatrics
Why it matters
The group Kennedy once led is using racketeering law against the doctors’ group that sets the tone for pediatric vaccine advice, and that is itself suing HHS over the new schedule. The two cases now run side by side.
On January 21, 2026, Children’s Health Defense filed a civil racketeering (RICO) suit against the American Academy of Pediatrics in federal court in Washington, D.C. CHD alleges the AAP’s vaccine-safety claims and recommendations are shaped by its financial ties to vaccine makers.
The same day, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced an investigation into whether drug companies, pediatricians and insurers colluded to push vaccines that are not medically necessary.
CHD’s case page, linked below, has the complaint and filings.
Source
AJF reporting.
Related coverage
CDC study in Pediatrics: parent-reported autism up 42% in five years, and 120% among preschoolers
This is the federal government’s own survey, published in the flagship pediatrics journal, and it shows autism rising faster than at any point in the CDC’s recent data. Children’s Health Defense asks the question the paper leaves open: what is driving it?
Kennedy launches a federal vaccine-injury push: an NIH clinic, paid VAERS reporting and a rebuilt reporting system
For decades families who reported a reaction after a vaccine were told it was a coincidence. HHS is now building a clinic to study those cases and paying doctors to report them. It is the most concrete step yet toward the vaccine-safety research Kennedy promised.
Appeals court in Boston hears Kennedy’s bid to revive the slimmed-down childhood vaccine schedule
This lawsuit decides whether the January 2026 schedule overhaul and Kennedy’s new ACIP can take effect at all. Until the First Circuit rules, the old schedule stays in force and the reconstituted vaccine committee cannot vote.